Skip to main content

US Legal Decisions Reveal Risk

Syndicate content
LawyersUSA - Latest Decisions
Updated: 50 weeks 1 day ago

Fired employee entitled to long-term disability benefits

Fri, 2009-03-06 03:21
An employee was wrongfully denied long-term disability benefits for injuries suffered in two automobile accidents – even though she didn’t apply for benefits until months after she was fired for allegedly poor performance, the 6th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Collection letter doesn't violate Fair Debt Act

Fri, 2009-03-06 03:19
A collection letter didn’t violate federal consumer protection law – even though the amount stated for "interest due" did not accurately state the total amount of interest that had accrued on an overdue credit card account, the 7th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Defendants may remove class action to federal court

Wed, 2009-03-04 05:16
Chocolate manufacturers may be able to remove a consumer class action alleging antitrust violations to federal court – even though the plaintiff’s complaint failed to indicate that the amount in controversy met the minimum for federal jurisdiction, the 8th Circuit has ruled in vacating a remand order.

Law firm can't demand set aside for ERISA fees

Tue, 2009-03-03 04:35
A law firm can’t require a pension plan to set aside funds for the payment of its anticipated fees from an ERISA class action, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in vacating a preliminary injunction.

Manufacturer needn't warn about others' products

Sat, 2009-02-28 00:23
A manufacturer has no duty to warn of the danger of another manufacturer’s product used in conjunction with its own product, the California Court of Appeal has ruled.

Annuity isn't exempt in bankruptcy

Fri, 2009-02-27 05:39
An annuity that a debtor purchased from his bankruptcy lawyer does not qualify as exempt property in his Chapter 7 case, the 9th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

Court rules in religious monument case

Thu, 2009-02-26 05:01
A monument in a public park constitutes government speech and therefore is not subject to the strict scrutiny that government regulation of private speech would face under the First Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.The 10th Circuit concluded that the city must show a compelling justification for denying the request to erect the monument and establish that its objectives could not be achieved by more narrowly tailored means. But the Supreme Court said that a city’s decision was not subject to strict scrutiny.

Out-of-state gay adoption is enforceable

Thu, 2009-02-26 04:23
A lesbian could enforce an Illinois adoption order in a custody dispute with her former partner, even though the state where she now resides – Michigan – doesn’t recognize adoptions by same-sex couples, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled in reversing a dismissal.

Class-action arbitration waiver needn't be enforced

Wed, 2009-02-25 23:26
The Federal Arbitration Act does not bar application of state law to invalidate a class-action waiver, the 3rd Circuit has ruled in reversing a U.S. District Court.

No individual liability under Title VII

Wed, 2009-02-25 11:25
An individual employee cannot be held liable for employment discrimination as an “agent” of the employer, the 1st Circuit has ruled in affirming a dismissal.

Defaulting homeowner must pay lender's attorney fees

Fri, 2009-02-06 22:59
Public policy doesn’t bar enforcement of a provision in a residential mortgage contract requiring a defaulting borrower to pay a lender’s attorney fees as a condition of terminating foreclosure proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled.

Cost shifting ordered in multiple-defendant case

Fri, 2009-02-06 03:44
A corrections officer sued for allegedly mistreating a prisoner may recover his costs when the plaintiff was awarded less than a pretrial joint settlement offered by all the defendants in the case, the 1st Circuit has ruled in reversing an order denying costs.Click here for the 1st Circuit opinion.

Store may be liable for fall over 'obvious' hazard

Fri, 2009-02-06 01:41
A drugstore may be liable for injuries suffered by a customer who tripped over a plainly visible pallet used to display merchandise, the Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled.The plaintiff tripped over an empty pallet located adjacent to the customer service counter at a Walgreens store.

Forfeiture clause doesn't violate state wage laws

Thu, 2009-02-05 04:36
A forfeiture provision in an employee stock plan doesn’t violate state wage laws, Massachusetts’ highest court has ruled in answering a certified question from a U.S. District Court.

AmEx can't enforce ban on class-wide arbitration

Wed, 2009-02-04 02:46
American Express can’t enforce a clause prohibiting class-wide arbitration contained in its contracts with individual merchants, the 2nd Circuit has ruled in reversing an order compelling arbitration.Click here for the 2nd Circuit opinion.

Two deaths are separate occurrences under policy

Tue, 2009-02-03 03:07
The accidental deaths of two boys at an excavation site constituted separate “occurrences” under the property owner’s liability insurance policy, the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled in reinstating a judgment against the insurer.

Owner had no duty to warn of asbestos

Sat, 2009-01-31 03:16
Building owners didn’t have a duty to warn an independent contractor’s employee of the dangers of asbestos exposure, the Kentucky Supreme Court has ruled in affirming a summary judgment.The plaintiff sued the property owners for negligence after he developed asbestosis.

Binding arbitration required in legal fee dispute

Fri, 2009-01-30 03:55
A lawyer could enforce a clause requiring his client to submit a fee dispute to binding arbitration – even though state law generally guarantees a right to trial for a client who is dissatisfied with an arbitration award, the California Supreme Court has ruled in reversing a denial of arbitration.

Can discovery order be immediately appealed?

Tue, 2009-01-27 05:41
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a party may immediately appeal an order to disclose materials said to be covered by the attorney-client privilege.

Court finds prosecutor immune from suit

Tue, 2009-01-27 05:36
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that police and prosecutors are shielded by absolute immunity from a §1983 claim alleging poor training, supervision, and communications systems led to impeachment evidence being withheld from a defendant’s attorney.